🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation established by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this international discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.